> > +F: include/dt-bindings/leds/ > > F: include/linux/leds.h > I'd not say this is right. I'm not sure what the docs says, but I > don't commit dt changes without ack from Rob. With yaml stuff, I'm > even less confident doing so. > So I'd say Rob maintains this. https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/leds/leds-class.rst: " [...] If required color or function is missing, please submit a patch to linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. [...] " This was the only thing pointing me to the linux-leds list when I submitted my patches for LED_FUNCTION_RSSI etc. last week. I only found it when I had already submitted to Rob and devicetree@ beforehand. However, all of the discussion actually took place at linux-leds@ after I resent there as well. I do not care who merges this or whom I should send this to, but I think get_maintainers.sh should point me to the correct list where proposed changes are actually discussed (which happened on the linux-leds list). Best Adrian
Attachment:
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
