Aw: Re: led block trigger patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Subject: Aw: Re: led block trigger patch
From: truart@xxxxxx
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:53:22 +0200
Cc: linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: normal
In-reply-to: <20200810073359.GA15023@amd>
References: <trinity-ff7f1644-b76d-424b-9a6f-8caaf9961ffe-1595962052162@3c-app-gmx-bap12> <50db75e2-d53c-ce8b-bd00-1099be0e2e74@ifi.lmu.de> <trinity-bc8857f4-cee1-4b95-a4fd-cc817119a95c-1597042087357@3c-app-gmx-bap76> <20200810073359.GA15023@amd>
Sensitivity: Normal

> What was the point of me reviewing the old patch when you are not
> going to fix it? That was not very constructive.

I'm sorry :( I really didn't mean to cause unneccessary work for anyone!
Michael

References:
- led block trigger patch
  - From: truart
- Re: led block trigger patch
  - From: truart
- Re: led block trigger patch
  - From: Pavel Machek

Prev by Date: Re: led block trigger patch
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v32 1/6] dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx family of RGB drivers
Previous by thread: Re: led block trigger patch
Next by thread: [PATCH v7 0/3] leds: pwm: add support for default-state device
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux