Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: leds: Add binding for sgm3140

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luca,

On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:47:36AM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 11. März 2020 13:49:35 CET Dan Murphy wrote:
> > On 3/9/20 3:35 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > > Add YAML devicetree binding for SGMICRO SGM3140 charge pump used for
> > > camera flash LEDs.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since RFC:
> > > - new patch
> > > 
> > > I'm not sure about the completeness of this binding as it doesn't
> > > mention the led subnode at all.
> > > The only existing led yaml binding is leds/leds-max77650.yaml which
> > > mentions the subnode but duplicates properties from documented in
> > > leds/common.txt.
> > > 
> > >   .../bindings/leds/leds-sgm3140.yaml           | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644
> > >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-sgm3140.yaml
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-sgm3140.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-sgm3140.yaml new file mode
> > > 100644
> > > index 000000000000..be9384573d02
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-sgm3140.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/leds-sgm3140.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: SGMICRO SGM3140 500mA Buck/Boost Charge Pump LED Driver
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > +  The SGM3140 is a current-regulated charge pump which can regulate two
> > > current +  levels for Flash and Torch modes.
> > > +
> > > +  It is controlled with two GPIO pins.
> > 
> > Please define "It".  Not sure what is controlled here.
> > 
> 
> "It" means the SGM3140. Not sure how else to write that or what the correct 
> term for such a component is.

Maybe "The device" ? I think Dan's concern is that he wasn't sure if
"It" referred to "the device" or to "flash and torch modes".

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux