.pwm_period_ns is an unsigned integer. So when led->pwm_period_ns > 0 is false, we now assign 0 to a value that is already 0, so it doesn't hurt and we can skip checking the actual value. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c index 8b6965a563e9..b72fd89ff390 100644 --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv, pwm_get_args(led_data->pwm, &pargs); led_data->period = pargs.period; - if (!led_data->period && (led->pwm_period_ns > 0)) + if (!led_data->period) led_data->period = led->pwm_period_ns; ret = devm_led_classdev_register(dev, &led_data->cdev); -- 2.24.0
