Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] backlight/arcxcnn fix vendor prefix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> [Sorry to those receiving this twice... had to dig this out from the
> archives and sent it to the lists from the wrong mailer]
> 
> On 27/11/2018 00:44, Brian Dodge wrote:
> >Thank you Pavel, that is a good point.
> >
> >The chip vendor has indicated that there is no reason to maintain the
> >old/improper prefix and wishes to go forward (only) with the "arctic"
> >prefix and any existing dts files are or will be updated.
> 
> Looks like this patch series has fallen into the cracks a little.
> 
> I think I assumed this info would end in the description of patch v2 1/3 (in
> order to answer Rob's feedback) and I sat and waited for a respin. On the
> other hand... I didn't actually say that explicitly anywhere! So... I'd
> recommend a respin perhaps with a small bit of text explaining how the
> vendor can state that any existing dts files will be updated. This is a
> peripheral device so these strings are probably embedded into OEM
> devicetrees rather than exclusively under the control of the vendor.

So in next email you give good reason not to apply this :-).

Anyway, this is Doc*/devicetree/, so not my area.
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux