On Sun 2019-06-09 13:03:40, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> Thank you for the patches.
>
> On 6/8/19 12:55 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >We have a dedicated pointer for that, so use it. Much easier to read and
> >less computation involved.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> >
> >Please apply to your subsystem tree.
> >
> > drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c
> >index a9f5dad55956..460626d81c6a 100644
> >--- a/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c
> >+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c
> >@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static int pca955x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > int ngpios = 0;
> > chip = &pca955x_chipdefs[id->driver_data];
> >- adapter = to_i2c_adapter(client->dev.parent);
> >+ adapter = client->adapter;
> > pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
> > if (!pdata) {
> > pdata = pca955x_get_pdata(client, chip);
> >
>
> For both 4/34 and 5/34:
>
> Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxx>
4 and 5:
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
But I wonder if it should go through the leds tree?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
