On Sun 2019-03-17 22:44:22, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 02:20:19AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Fri 2019-03-15 21:13:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > There is no evidence of officially registered ACPI IDs for these devices. > > > Thus, revert commit 44b3e31d540e917a4d2292b902ade63fa1748d9a. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > NAK. I don't believe someone did that code without testing. > > Testing is irrelevant here. Do you believe someone wrote that code without testing? > > It's unlike device tree where IDs comes from thin air. > Do you have any document in possession that supports legal base for these IDs > being in the kernel? Legal? ACPI specification was not law last time I checked. (And: no.) Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
