On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 02:20:19AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Fri 2019-03-15 21:13:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > There is no evidence of officially registered ACPI IDs for these devices. > > Thus, revert commit 44b3e31d540e917a4d2292b902ade63fa1748d9a. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > NAK. I don't believe someone did that code without testing. Testing is irrelevant here. It's unlike device tree where IDs comes from thin air. Do you have any document in possession that supports legal base for these IDs being in the kernel? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
