Re: [PATCH v5] DT: leds: Improve description of flash LEDs related properties

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/04/15 09:23, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 04/08/2015 05:15 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> > On 08/04/15 16:31, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> >> Properties defining maximum values for LED currents and timeout should
>>> >> be mandatory to avoid the risk of hardware damage. This patch fixes
>>> >> the issue.

>>> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
>>> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
>>> >> @@ -10,6 +10,17 @@ can influence the way of the LED device initialization, the LED components
>>> >>   have to be tightly coupled with the LED device binding. They are represented
>>> >>   by child nodes of the parent LED device binding.
>>> >>
>>> >> +Required properties for child nodes:
>> >
>> > These properties are mandatory only for LEDs with Flash/Torch capabilities,
>> > aren't they?
>
> flash-max-microamp and flash-timeout-us properties description mention
> that they refer to flash LEDs. Perhaps this should be made indeed more
> explicit.

I understood it as if we wanted to make those 3 new properties mandatory
for all LEDs. I think it's better to make it explicit to avoid confusion.

>  > Requiring those properties for all led nodes would make all
>> > current dtses not compliant with the DT binding specification AFAICT.
>
> I was also worrying about making led-max-microamp required, but others
> didn't share my objections. I think that we have to reexamine this.
> 
> Please refer to the discussion under [PATCH v4]. The role of this
> led-max-microamp property would be preventing hardware damage.

Well, we can't simply add such a required property now to all led device
nodes. It would cause dtb/kernel compatibility issues. So far
led-max-microamp was not required for simple LEDs, why would we have to
add it now?

>> > How about:
>> >
>> > "Required properties for child nodes for LEDs with Flash/Torch capabilities:" ?
>> >
>>> >> +- led-max-microamp : Maximum LED supply current in microamperes
>>> >> +                     (torch LED for flash devices). Controllers that have no
>>> >> +                     configurable current can omit this property.
>>> >> +- flash-max-microamp : Maximum flash LED supply current in microamperes.
>>> >> +- flash-timeout-us : Timeout in microseconds after which the flash
>>> >> +                     LED is turned off.
>>> >> +
>> >
>>> >> +Above properties determine a LED driver IC settings required for safe
>>> >> +operation. They should be also used as the initial settings for the IC.
>> >
>> > Shouldn't "Controllers that have no configurable current can omit this
>> > property" refer to both led-max-microamp and flash-max-microamp?
>  >
>> > I would drop the "Above...for the IC." paragraph and instead add something like:
>> >
>> > "For controllers that have no configurable current the led-max-microamp,
>> > flash-max-microamp properties respectively can be omitted. For controllers that
>> > have no configurable timeout the flash-timeout-us property can be omitted."
>
> Are we going to avoid mentioning about their role in preventing
> hardware damage (former "for safe operation" sequence)?

I don't have strong opinion, up to you. I'd say this additional note is
not needed when we explained those properties specify limits for controllers
with configurable current.

--
Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux