Re: [PATCH v3] led/led-class: Handle LEDs with the same name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sakari

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd use dev_warn() or even WARN_ON(ret). This is a rather serious issue as
> now the probe order defines the name of the device. There might be something
> better such as the I2C bus/address.

I have no problem in sending a dev_warn, WARN_ON looks too much to me.

In my example (dt overlays), it is perfectly ok to have duplicated names.

>
> If the registration order for some reason changes, that'd revert the device
> names. In Media controller this is part of the user space API.

Would it be possible for media controller leds to have a name based on
their address?


Regarding s/dev_info/dev_warn : Do you want to send the patch or I should do it?

Regards!

-- 
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux