Re: [PATCH] leds: lp55xx: add support for Device Tree bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Kim, Milo <Milo.Kim@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> It looks good to me, either. Just two minor points here.
>>> One is the name of vendor. I would suggest name changes from 'national' to 'ti'.
>>
>> Why? Our datasheet for LP5521 says this component is manufactured
>> by National Semiconductor ... was the component sold over to
>> Texas Instruments?
>
> I think NI was acquired by TI 2 years ago. But I'm not sure whether TI
> still keeps using the brand name NI for those NI products.

Hm yeah the Wikipedia tells me they were acquired, well it doesn't hurt
if we add both strings anyway and I think that's expected as companies
tend to eat each other like this all the time anyway.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux