On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 1:38 PM Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 3:41 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This is a really helpful comment. It got me wondering: can we have > > host-side unit tests for our proc macros? Code is better than > > comments, of course. > > That makes sense (in fact, e.g. Benno wanted them for pinned-init), > but I will defer that until we have the new build system to avoid > adding more things to our plate. > > > This makes sense. I wonder if we should think about being able to > > declare a test that runs both on host and in KUnit. > > Yeah, when we originally discussed `#[test]`s (years ago), we wanted > to have "attributes" or "tags" like `#[test(host, kernel)]`. > > But, again, something for later -- I would rather we finally land `#[test]`s. > > Cheers, > Miguel Works for me. Could you link to issues tracking these, if they exist? Reviewed-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxx>
