On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 3:41 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is a really helpful comment. It got me wondering: can we have > host-side unit tests for our proc macros? Code is better than > comments, of course. That makes sense (in fact, e.g. Benno wanted them for pinned-init), but I will defer that until we have the new build system to avoid adding more things to our plate. > This makes sense. I wonder if we should think about being able to > declare a test that runs both on host and in KUnit. Yeah, when we originally discussed `#[test]`s (years ago), we wanted to have "attributes" or "tags" like `#[test(host, kernel)]`. But, again, something for later -- I would rather we finally land `#[test]`s. Cheers, Miguel
