On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 7:17 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue 2025-02-04 05:27:23, Tamir Duberstein wrote: > > Oops, meant to address this in the last reply. > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 3:39 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Should this go via the printk tree, please? > > > Or is David going to take it via the kunit tree? > > > > Going via printk would be my preference. > > I am fine with it. I assume that you are going to send v3 with > the updated Makefile. Well, let's wait a bit for more potential > feedback. > > Best Regards, > Petr I'll send v3 today - I'm adding an extra patch that breaks some tests down into proper cases for better output.
