Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 05:27:23 -0500
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Z6HSFvvgxFVGDQeI@pathway.suse.cz>

Oops, meant to address this in the last reply.

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 3:39 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Should this go via the printk tree, please?
> Or is David going to take it via the kunit tree?

Going via printk would be my preference.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
  - From: Petr Mladek

References:
- [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
  - From: Tamir Duberstein
- Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
  - From: Petr Mladek

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 08/10] net: pktgen: fix access outside of user given buffer in pktgen_if_write()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux