Akihiko Odaki wrote: > On 2025/01/20 20:24, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > Akihiko Odaki wrote: > >> hdr_len is repeatedly used so keep it in a local variable. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/net/tap.c | 17 +++++++---------- > >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c > >> index 061c2f27dfc83f5e6d0bea4da0e845cc429b1fd8..7ee2e9ee2a89fd539b087496b92d2f6198266f44 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c > >> @@ -645,6 +645,7 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, > >> int err; > >> struct virtio_net_hdr vnet_hdr = { 0 }; > >> int vnet_hdr_len = 0; > >> + int hdr_len = 0; > >> int copylen = 0; > >> int depth; > >> bool zerocopy = false; > >> @@ -672,6 +673,7 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, > >> err = -EINVAL; > >> if (tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len) > iov_iter_count(from)) > >> goto err; > >> + hdr_len = tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len); > >> } > >> > >> len = iov_iter_count(from); > >> @@ -683,11 +685,8 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, > >> if (msg_control && sock_flag(&q->sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY)) { > >> struct iov_iter i; > >> > >> - copylen = vnet_hdr.hdr_len ? > >> - tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len) : GOODCOPY_LEN; > >> - if (copylen > good_linear) > >> - copylen = good_linear; > >> - else if (copylen < ETH_HLEN) > >> + copylen = min(hdr_len ? hdr_len : GOODCOPY_LEN, good_linear); > >> + if (copylen < ETH_HLEN) > >> copylen = ETH_HLEN; > >> linear = copylen; > >> i = *from; > >> @@ -698,11 +697,9 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, > >> > >> if (!zerocopy) { > >> copylen = len; > >> - linear = tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len); > >> - if (linear > good_linear) > >> - linear = good_linear; > >> - else if (linear < ETH_HLEN) > >> - linear = ETH_HLEN; > >> + linear = min(hdr_len, good_linear); > >> + if (copylen < ETH_HLEN) > >> + copylen = ETH_HLEN; > > > > Similar to previous patch, I don't think this patch is significant > > enough to warrant the code churn. > > The following patch will require replacing > tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len) > with > tap16_to_cpu(q->flags, vnet_hdr.hdr_len) > > It will make some lines a bit too long. Calling tap16_to_cpu() at > multiple places is also not good to keep the vnet implementation unified > as the function inspects vnet_hdr. > > This patch is independently too trivial, but I think it is a worthwhile > cleanup combined with the following patch. Ok. I see what you mean.