Re: [PATCH net-next v4 8/9] tap: Keep hdr_len in tap_get_user()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> hdr_len is repeatedly used so keep it in a local variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/tap.c | 17 +++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
> index 061c2f27dfc83f5e6d0bea4da0e845cc429b1fd8..7ee2e9ee2a89fd539b087496b92d2f6198266f44 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
> @@ -645,6 +645,7 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control,
>  	int err;
>  	struct virtio_net_hdr vnet_hdr = { 0 };
>  	int vnet_hdr_len = 0;
> +	int hdr_len = 0;
>  	int copylen = 0;
>  	int depth;
>  	bool zerocopy = false;
> @@ -672,6 +673,7 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control,
>  		err = -EINVAL;
>  		if (tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len) > iov_iter_count(from))
>  			goto err;
> +		hdr_len = tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len);
>  	}
>  
>  	len = iov_iter_count(from);
> @@ -683,11 +685,8 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control,
>  	if (msg_control && sock_flag(&q->sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY)) {
>  		struct iov_iter i;
>  
> -		copylen = vnet_hdr.hdr_len ?
> -			tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len) : GOODCOPY_LEN;
> -		if (copylen > good_linear)
> -			copylen = good_linear;
> -		else if (copylen < ETH_HLEN)
> +		copylen = min(hdr_len ? hdr_len : GOODCOPY_LEN, good_linear);
> +		if (copylen < ETH_HLEN)
>  			copylen = ETH_HLEN;
>  		linear = copylen;
>  		i = *from;
> @@ -698,11 +697,9 @@ static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control,
>  
>  	if (!zerocopy) {
>  		copylen = len;
> -		linear = tap16_to_cpu(q, vnet_hdr.hdr_len);
> -		if (linear > good_linear)
> -			linear = good_linear;
> -		else if (linear < ETH_HLEN)
> -			linear = ETH_HLEN;
> +		linear = min(hdr_len, good_linear);
> +		if (copylen < ETH_HLEN)
> +			copylen = ETH_HLEN;

Similar to previous patch, I don't think this patch is significant
enough to warrant the code churn.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux