On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 09:26:01PM +0800, Weizhao Ouyang wrote: > > If we don't have SME we should be skipping over all the SME code and > > never even looking at the value of SVCR. Looking at the current version > > of the code it does that, it branches to check_sve_in if SME is not > > enabled. > Yes we should skip it, this is just a minor tweak based on the > current implementation, after all, we manually passed its value by > svcr_in. It's a fairly trivial tweak to make... in any case, it looks like we also need the same change in the save path. > Which latest code version are you referring to? I think check_sve_in > is in fp testcase, not in the abi testcase. (checked the -next tree) Ah, yes sorry.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
