On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:02:29 -0700 Shuah Khan wrote: > > Sorry for the delay, the responses to v1 weren't super positive > > but I keep thinking this would be very useful :) Or at the very > > least I find workflows@ very useful and informative as a maintainer. > > > > Posting as an RFC because we need to create the new ML. > I have to repeat the same thing I said when you sent RFC v1 > It is going to add the confusion - people don't cc the one > mailing list we have now. > > I am going to have to say no. Sorry. To me the dissonance between your admission that people don't CC the current list (IOW status quo isn't great) and the resistance to change is fairly apparent. But it is obviously your call.
