On 11/15/24 13:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
The testing effort is increasing throughout the community. The tests are generally merged into the subsystem trees, and are of relatively narrow interest. The patch volume on linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx makes it hard to follow the changes to the framework, and discuss proposals. Create a new ML focused on the framework of kselftests, which will hopefully be similarly low volume to the workflows@ mailing list. From the responses to v1 I gather that the preference is to keep the existing list for all (or create an alias to it); the framework-only section should be the one to have a new list created. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Sorry for the delay, the responses to v1 weren't super positive but I keep thinking this would be very useful :) Or at the very least I find workflows@ very useful and informative as a maintainer. Posting as an RFC because we need to create the new ML.
I have to repeat the same thing I said when you sent RFC v1 It is going to add the confusion - people don't cc the one mailing list we have now. I am going to have to say no. Sorry. thanks, -- Shuah
