On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 12:05:30PM +0200, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> On 17/10/2024 17:49, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> >> Commit 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal
> >> frame") introduced the BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE macro but it has
> >> apparently never been used.
> > Nit: Should there be a statement of what the patch does?
> >
> > Same throughout the series.
> >
> > (Yes, I know it's in the subject line, but Mutt doesn't think that's
> > part of the message body, so I can't see it now that I'm replying...
> > and submitting-patches.rst and e.g., maintainer-tip.rst seem to take
> > the same policy, albeit without quite stating it explicitly.)
>
> Ah good point, I didn't consider that. Will make it explicit in patch 1
> and 2.
Thanks.
(I have a patch for submitting-patches.rst knocking about to propose
making this more explicit, but I didn't dare to post it so far...)
Cheers
---Dave
