On 17/10/2024 17:49, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
>> Commit 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal
>> frame") introduced the BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE macro but it has
>> apparently never been used.
> Nit: Should there be a statement of what the patch does?
>
> Same throughout the series.
>
> (Yes, I know it's in the subject line, but Mutt doesn't think that's
> part of the message body, so I can't see it now that I'm replying...
> and submitting-patches.rst and e.g., maintainer-tip.rst seem to take
> the same policy, albeit without quite stating it explicitly.)
Ah good point, I didn't consider that. Will make it explicit in patch 1
and 2.
Kevin
