On 2024/10/1 20:11, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 07:55:08AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
+struct vfio_device_pasid_attach_iommufd_pt {
+ __u32 argsz;
+ __u32 flags;
+ __u32 pasid;
+ __u32 pt_id;
+};
+
+#define VFIO_DEVICE_PASID_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT _IO(VFIO_TYPE,
VFIO_BASE + 21)
Not sure whether this was discussed before. Does it make sense
to reuse the existing VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT
by introducing a new pasid field and a new flag bit?
Maybe? I don't have a strong feeling either way.
There is somewhat less code if you reuse the ioctl at least
I had a rough memory that I was suggested to add a separate ioctl for
PASID. Let's see Alex's opinion.
@Alex.
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
