On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 06:29:49PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Le 11/10/2024 à 17:21, Andy Shevchenko a écrit : > > [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 5:20 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 3:57 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:38:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:44 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:25:07PM +0800, David Gow wrote: ... > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/bitfield_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/checksum_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/cmdline_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/cpumask_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/fortify_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/hashtable_test.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/is_signed_type_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/kunit_iov_iter.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/list-test.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/memcpy_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/overflow_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/siphash_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/slub_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/stackinit_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/string_helpers_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/string_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_bits.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_fprobe.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_hash.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_kprobes.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_linear_ranges.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_list_sort.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/test_sort.c (100%) > > > > > > > rename lib/{ => tests}/usercopy_kunit.c (100%) > > > > > > > > > > > > While I support the idea, I think this adds an additional churn in creating a > > > > > > duplicate 'test' in the filenames. Why they all can't be cut while removing? > > > > > > (at least this question is not answered in the commit message) > > > > > > > > > > To avoid duplicate *.ko file names? > > > > > > > > With what? Sorry, but I don't see how it's a problem. These are test cases. > > > > Do they use kernel command line parameters? If so, shouldn't KUnit take care > > > > about it in a more proper way? > > > > > > If .e.g. lib/list_sort.o could be modular, its module would be called > > > "list_sort.ko", conflicting with the "list_sort.ko" test module. > > But as it is now in lib/tests/, the module will also be installed in tests/ > subdir, so it shouldn't clash anymore ? > > You'd have: > > /lib/modules/lib/list_sort.ko and > /lib/modules/lib/tests/list_sort.ko > > Or did I miss something ? I believe Geert is talking about `modprobe list-sort` in the userspace. Which one will be loaded? > > Can't this be solved by automatically adding a prefix in Makefile for > > kunit tests, for example? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
