Re: [PATCH v2 17/19] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_viommu_cache_invalidate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 09:59:54AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:

> +static int arm_smmu_viommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
> +					    struct iommu_user_data_array *array)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_domain *domain = iommufd_viommu_to_parent_domain(viommu);
> +
> +	return __arm_smmu_cache_invalidate_user(
> +			to_smmu_domain(domain), viommu, array);

I'd like to have the viommu struct directly hold the VMID. The nested
parent should be sharable between multiple viommus, it doesn't make
any sense that it would hold the vmid.

This is struggling because it is trying too hard to not have the
driver allocate the viommu, and I think we should just go ahead and do
that. Store the vmid, today copied from the nesting parent in the vmid
private struct. No need for iommufd_viommu_to_parent_domain(), just
rework the APIs to pass the vmid down not a domain.

Jason




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux