On 8/16/24 12:03 PM, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 06:14 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote:
On 8/6/24 19:45, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 07:18 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote:
Great, thanks for the review. With this completed, I guess we can unwind
the (mail) stack to [1]. Is that ingress-to-local et al. something you
wanted to take care of yourself or can I give it a try?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87msmqn9ws.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
I haven't stated any work on. You're welcome to tackle that.
All I have is a toy test that I've used to generate the redirect matrix.
Perhaps it can serve as inspiration:
https://github.com/jsitnicki/sockmap-redir-matrix
All right, please let me know if this is more or less what you meant and
I'll post the whole series for a review (+patch to purge sockmap_listen of
redir tests, fix misnomers). Mostly I've just copypasted your code
(mangling it terribly along the way), so I feel silly claiming the
authorship. Should I assign you as an author?
Don't worry about it. I appreciate the help.
I will take a look at the redirect tests this weekend.
Note that the patches are based on [2], which has not reached bpf-next
(patchwork says: "Needs ACK").
[2] [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] selftests/bpf: Various sockmap-related fixes
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240731-selftest-sockmap-fixes-v2-0-08a0c73abed2@xxxxxxx/
Might have slipped throught the cracks...
Andrii, Martin,
The patch set still applies cleanly to bpf-next.
Would you be able to a look at this series? Anything we need to do?
will take a look. no need to resend.
