On 8/6/24 19:45, Jakub Sitnicki wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 07:18 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote: >> Great, thanks for the review. With this completed, I guess we can unwind >> the (mail) stack to [1]. Is that ingress-to-local et al. something you >> wanted to take care of yourself or can I give it a try? >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87msmqn9ws.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > I haven't stated any work on. You're welcome to tackle that. > > All I have is a toy test that I've used to generate the redirect matrix. > Perhaps it can serve as inspiration: > > https://github.com/jsitnicki/sockmap-redir-matrix All right, please let me know if this is more or less what you meant and I'll post the whole series for a review (+patch to purge sockmap_listen of redir tests, fix misnomers). Mostly I've just copypasted your code (mangling it terribly along the way), so I feel silly claiming the authorship. Should I assign you as an author? Note that the patches are based on [2], which has not reached bpf-next (patchwork says: "Needs ACK"). [2] [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] selftests/bpf: Various sockmap-related fixes https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240731-selftest-sockmap-fixes-v2-0-08a0c73abed2@xxxxxxx/
