On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:09 AM Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [ ...] > > And singling out DRM because it regularly allegedly breaks things on > xtensa or m68k and claiming we're not taking CI seriously because of it > is completely ridiculous. If the all the subsystems were taking CI as > seriously as DRM, we would be in a much better place. > FWIW: $ git grep CONFIG_DRM arch/xtensa/ arch/m68k/ arch/m68k/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM=y arch/m68k/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION=y arch/m68k/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_VIRTIO_GPU=y arch/xtensa/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM=y arch/xtensa/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_VGEM=y arch/xtensa/configs/virt_defconfig:CONFIG_DRM_VIRTIO_GPU=y If that isn't supported, it might really make sense to declare that CONFIG_DRM depends on !xtensa and !m68k. Guenter
