Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
From: Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:22:59 -0800
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nikolai Kondrashov <spbnick@xxxxxxxxx>, Helen Koike <helen.koike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linuxtv-ci@xxxxxxxxxxx, dave.pigott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pawiecz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tales.aparecida@xxxxxxxxx, workflows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernelci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx, cocci@xxxxxxxx, Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxxx, laura.nao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ricardo.canuelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240304-benevolent-brawny-urchin-0af0ad@houat>

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:09 AM Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> And singling out DRM because it regularly allegedly breaks things on
> xtensa or m68k and claiming we're not taking CI seriously because of it
> is completely ridiculous. If the all the subsystems were taking CI as
> seriously as DRM, we would be in a much better place.
>

The failure I reported as an example was on arm, not on xtensa or m68k
I'll disable CONFIG_DRM in my build tests for xtensa and m68k going
forward.

Thanks,
Guenter

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Helen Koike
- [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Helen Koike
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Maxime Ripard
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Nikolai Kondrashov
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Guenter Roeck
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Maxime Ripard
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Guenter Roeck
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Maxime Ripard
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Guenter Roeck
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
  - From: Maxime Ripard

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] selftests/dmabuf-heap: conform test to TAP format output
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kci-gitlab: Introducing GitLab-CI Pipeline for Kernel Testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]