Hi Zhangjin, On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 02:21:20AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > This patchset assumes the chmod_net removal patchset will be applied at > first, if not, the chmod_argv0 added alphabetically will not be applied. > Since our new chmod_argv0 is exactly added to replace chmod_net, so, > Willy, is it ok for you to at least apply the chmod_net removal patch > [5] before this patchset? Sure, and thanks for the reminder, I had missed it in the middle of the flood. (...) > LOG: testing summary: > > arch/board | result > ------------|------------ > arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. > x86_64/pc | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. > mipsel/malta | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. > loongarch64/virt | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. Great, I like this, thank you! That was precisely the purpose of the "skipped" initially, not to be too strictly bound to a specific config. Now it's indeed even more flexible and that's better. Series queued as well, thank you! Willy
