Hi Shaopeng Tan,
Subject line still with typo. Also, what does "resctrl is not run as root"
mean? Do you mean "resctrl_tests"? The subject line can be made more succinct
while the details are moved to the commit message.
On 12/13/2021 2:01 AM, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
> To unify the return code of resctrl_tests with the return code of
> selftest set, return KSFT_SKIP (4) if resctrl file system is not
> supported or resctrl is not run as root.
Please review the feedback I provided to your first version. I do not
see the explanation of how changing ksft_exit_fail_msg() to
ksft_exit_skip() accomplishes the goal of unifying the return code.
It surely is not a good use of my time to review patches and have the
feedback ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> index 973f09a66e1e..3be0895c492b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> * 2. We execute perf commands
> */
> if (geteuid() != 0)
> - return ksft_exit_fail_msg("Not running as root, abort testing.\n");
> + return ksft_exit_skip("Not running as root, abort testing.\n");
>
> /* Detect AMD vendor */
> detect_amd();
> @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> sprintf(bm_type, "fill_buf");
>
> if (!check_resctrlfs_support())
> - return ksft_exit_fail_msg("resctrl FS does not exist\n");
> + return ksft_exit_skip("resctrl FS does not exist\n");
>
> filter_dmesg();
>
Reinette
