Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests/tc-testing: add exit code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-11-17 09:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:55:14 +0100 Davide Caratti wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:45:15PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
Mark the summary result as FAIL to prevent from confusing the selftest
framework if some of them are failed.

Previously, the selftest framework always treats it as *ok* even though
some of them are failed actually. That's because the script tdc.sh always
return 0.

yes, also tdc was lacking support for KSFT_SKIP for a long time.

Should this go via netdev? Is the risk of conflicts low enough
so it doesn't matter?


Yes, discussions should at minimal Cc netdev + tc maintainers.

We should probably add a MAINTAINERS entry for tdc. Adding Jamal.

Did you mean adding a maintainer for tdc or just generally point
who/what to involve when making changes? Typically the mailing list
should be sufficient. Outside the list, at the moment, any outstanding
issues on tdc are discussed/resolved in the monthly TC meetups (where
all the stake holders show up)...

cheers,
jamal





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux