On 2021-11-17 09:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:55:14 +0100 Davide Caratti wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:45:15PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
Mark the summary result as FAIL to prevent from confusing the selftest
framework if some of them are failed.
Previously, the selftest framework always treats it as *ok* even though
some of them are failed actually. That's because the script tdc.sh always
return 0.
yes, also tdc was lacking support for KSFT_SKIP for a long time.
Should this go via netdev? Is the risk of conflicts low enough
so it doesn't matter?
Yes, discussions should at minimal Cc netdev + tc maintainers.
We should probably add a MAINTAINERS entry for tdc. Adding Jamal.
Did you mean adding a maintainer for tdc or just generally point
who/what to involve when making changes? Typically the mailing list
should be sufficient. Outside the list, at the moment, any outstanding
issues on tdc are discussed/resolved in the monthly TC meetups (where
all the stake holders show up)...
cheers,
jamal
