On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 09:55:14 +0100 Davide Caratti wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 01:45:15PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote: > > Mark the summary result as FAIL to prevent from confusing the selftest > > framework if some of them are failed. > > > > Previously, the selftest framework always treats it as *ok* even though > > some of them are failed actually. That's because the script tdc.sh always > > return 0. > > yes, also tdc was lacking support for KSFT_SKIP for a long time. Should this go via netdev? Is the risk of conflicts low enough so it doesn't matter? We should probably add a MAINTAINERS entry for tdc. Adding Jamal.
