On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 00:33, 'Isabella Basso' via KUnit Development
<kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Split up test_hash_init so that it calls each test more explicitly
> insofar it is possible without rewriting the entire file. This aims at
> improving readability.
>
> Split tests performed on string_or as they don't interfere with those
> performed in hash_or. Also separate pr_info calls about skipped tests as
> they're not part of the tests themselves, but only warn about
> (un)defined arch-specific hash functions.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - As suggested by David Gow:
> 1. Rename arch-specific test functions.
> 2. Remove spare whitespace changes.
> - As suggested by Marco Elver:
> 1. Add struct for carrying test variables.
Did the patches get mixed up? The struct doesn't appear to be introduced here.
> Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Isabella Basso <isabellabdoamaral@xxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/test_hash.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_hash.c b/lib/test_hash.c
> index 08fe63776c4f..db9dd18b4e8b 100644
> --- a/lib/test_hash.c
> +++ b/lib/test_hash.c
> @@ -153,11 +153,39 @@ test_int_hash(unsigned long long h64, u32 hash_or[2][33])
>
> #define SIZE 256 /* Run time is cubic in SIZE */
>
> -static int __init
> -test_hash_init(void)
> +static int __init test_string_or(void)
> {
> char buf[SIZE+1];
> - u32 string_or = 0, hash_or[2][33] = { { 0, } };
> + u32 string_or = 0;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + fill_buf(buf, SIZE, 1);
> +
> + /* Test every possible non-empty substring in the buffer. */
> + for (j = SIZE; j > 0; --j) {
> + buf[j] = '\0';
> +
> + for (i = 0; i <= j; i++) {
> + u32 h0 = full_name_hash(buf+i, buf+i, j-i);
> +
> + string_or |= h0;
> + } /* i */
> + } /* j */
> +
> + /* The OR of all the hash values should cover all the bits */
> + if (~string_or) {
> + pr_err("OR of all string hash results = %#x != %#x",
> + string_or, -1u);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init test_hash_or(void)
> +{
> + char buf[SIZE+1];
> + u32 hash_or[2][33] = { { 0, } };
> unsigned tests = 0;
> unsigned long long h64 = 0;
> int i, j;
> @@ -187,7 +215,6 @@ test_hash_init(void)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - string_or |= h0;
> h64 = h64 << 32 | h0; /* For use with hash_64 */
> if (!test_int_hash(h64, hash_or))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -195,12 +222,6 @@ test_hash_init(void)
> } /* i */
> } /* j */
>
> - /* The OR of all the hash values should cover all the bits */
> - if (~string_or) {
> - pr_err("OR of all string hash results = %#x != %#x",
> - string_or, -1u);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> if (~hash_or[0][0]) {
> pr_err("OR of all __hash_32 results = %#x != %#x",
> hash_or[0][0], -1u);
> @@ -232,6 +253,13 @@ test_hash_init(void)
> }
> }
>
> + pr_notice("%u tests passed.", tests);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __init notice_skipped_tests(void)
> +{
> /* Issue notices about skipped tests. */
> #ifdef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32
> #if HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1
> @@ -247,10 +275,24 @@ test_hash_init(void)
> #else
> pr_info("hash_64() has no arch implementation to test.");
> #endif
> +}
>
> - pr_notice("%u tests passed.", tests);
> +static int __init
> +test_hash_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
>
> - return 0;
> + ret = test_string_or();
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = test_hash_or();
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + notice_skipped_tests();
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void __exit test_hash_exit(void)
> --
> 2.33.0
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/20210926223322.848641-4-isabellabdoamaral%40usp.br.
