Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] selftests/ptr_ring: add benchmark application for ptr_ring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021/7/2 17:04, Jason Wang wrote:
> 

[...]

> 
> 
>> I understand that you guys like to see a working testcase of virtio.
>> I would love to do that if I have the time and knowledge of virtio,
>> But I do not think I have the time and I am familiar enough with
>> virtio to fix that now.
> 
> 
> So ringtest is used for bench-marking the ring performance for different format. Virtio is only one of the supported ring format, ptr ring is another. Wrappers were used to reuse the same test logic.
> 
> Though you may see host/guest in the test, it's in fact done via two processes.
> 
> We need figure out:
> 
> 1) why the current ringtest.c does not fit for your requirement (it has SPSC test)

There is MPSC case used by pfifo_fast, it make more sense to use a separate selftest
for ptr_ring as ptr_ring has been used by various subsystems.


> 2) why can't we tweak the ptr_ring.c to be used by both ring_test and your benchmark

Actually that is what I do in this patch, move the specific part related to ptr_ring
to ptr_ring_test.h. When the virtio testing is refactored to work, it can reuse the
abstract layer in ptr_ring_test.h too.

> 
> If neither of the above work, we can invent new ptr_ring infrastructure under tests/
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
>>
>>
> 
> .
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux