On 12/20/20 10:18 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:27 AM Miguel Ojeda > <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 4:16 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Because if you get a report of something breaking for your change, you >>> need to work to resolve it, not argue about it. Otherwise it needs to >>> be dropped/reverted. >> >> Nobody has argued that. In fact, I explicitly said the opposite: "So I >> think we can fix them as they come.". >> >> I am expecting Masahiro to follow up. It has been less than 24 hours >> since the report, on a weekend. >> >> Cheers, >> Miguel > > > Sorry for the delay. > > Now I sent out the fix for lantiq_etop.c > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1355595/ > next-20201218, alpha:allmodconfig: fs/binfmt_em86.c: In function 'load_em86': fs/binfmt_em86.c:66:2: error: ignoring return value of 'remove_arg_zero' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' With a change like this, I'd have expected that there is a coccinelle script or similar to ensure that claims made in the commit message are true. Guenter
