On 12/12/20 9:04 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 5:18 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> This patch results in: >> >> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/smp-shx3.c: In function 'shx3_prepare_cpus': >> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/smp-shx3.c:76:3: error: ignoring return value of 'request_irq' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' >> >> when building sh:defconfig. Checking for calls to request_irq() >> suggests that there will be other similar errors in various builds. >> Reverting the patch fixes the problem. > > Which ones? From a quick grep and some filtering I could only find one > file with wrong usage apart from this one: > > drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c: > request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, 0, "etop_tx", priv); > drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_etop.c: > request_irq(irq, ltq_etop_dma_irq, 0, "etop_rx", priv); > > Of course, this does not cover other functions, but it means there > aren't many issues and/or people building the code if nobody complains > within a few weeks. So I think we can fix them as they come. > Witz komm raus, Du bist umzingelt. The key here is "if nobody complains". I would argue that it is _your_ responsibility to do those builds, and not the reponsibility of others to do it for you. But, sure, your call. Please feel free to ignore my report. Guenter
