On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:22 AM Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:23 AM <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:46:21AM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:25 AM <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:57:17PM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote: > > > > > > > > > The results can be seen this way: > > > > > > > > > > This is an excerpt from the test.log with the result in TAP format: > > > > > [snip] > > > > > ok 5 - example > > > > > # Subtest: min-heap > > > > > 1..6 > > > > > ok 1 - test_heapify_all_true > > > > > ok 2 - test_heapify_all_false > > > > > ok 3 - test_heap_push_true > > > > > ok 4 - test_heap_push_false > > > > > ok 5 - test_heap_pop_push_true > > > > > ok 6 - test_heap_pop_push_false > > > > > [snip] > > > > So ^ is TAP format? > > Yep, you can see the spec here: https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html > > > > > > > I don't care or care to use either; what does dmesg do? It used to be > > > > that just building the self-tests was sufficient and any error would > > > > show in dmesg when you boot the machine. > > > > > > > > But if I now have to use some damn tool, this is a regression. > > > > > > If you don't want to, you don't need to use the kunit-tool. If you > > > compile the tests as builtin and run the Kernel on your machine > > > the test result will be shown in dmesg in TAP format. > > > > That's seems a lot more verbose than it is now. I've recently even done > > a bunch of tests that don't print anything on success, dmesg is clutter > > enough already. > > What tests do you refer to? > > Running the test_min_heap.c, I got this from dmesg: > > min_heap_test: test passed > > And running min_heap_kunit.c: > > ok 1 - min-heap Gentle poke. I think Vitor was looking for a response. My guess is that Ian was waiting for a follow up patch.
