Hi Peter, On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:25 AM <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:57:17PM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote: > > > The results can be seen this way: > > > > This is an excerpt from the test.log with the result in TAP format: > > [snip] > > ok 5 - example > > # Subtest: min-heap > > 1..6 > > ok 1 - test_heapify_all_true > > ok 2 - test_heapify_all_false > > ok 3 - test_heap_push_true > > ok 4 - test_heap_push_false > > ok 5 - test_heap_pop_push_true > > ok 6 - test_heap_pop_push_false > > [snip] > > > > And this from kunit-tool: > > [snip] > > [18:43:32] ============================================================ > > [18:43:32] ======== [PASSED] min-heap ======== > > [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heapify_all_true > > [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heapify_all_false > > [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heap_push_true > > [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heap_push_false > > [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heap_pop_push_true > > [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heap_pop_push_false > > [18:43:32] ============================================================ > > [18:43:32] Testing complete. 20 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. > > [18:43:32] Elapsed time: 9.758s total, 0.001s configuring, 6.012s > > building, 0.000s running > > [snip] > > I don't care or care to use either; what does dmesg do? It used to be > that just building the self-tests was sufficient and any error would > show in dmesg when you boot the machine. > > But if I now have to use some damn tool, this is a regression. If you don't want to, you don't need to use the kunit-tool. If you compile the tests as builtin and run the Kernel on your machine the test result will be shown in dmesg in TAP format. BR, Vitor
