On 6/24/20 3:01 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:29 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 6/24/20 1:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:23:25AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >>>>>>> Regardless, it seems arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h is not needed any more? >>>>> >>>>>> True that, we can rip the file. >>>>> >>>>> Has anyone fixed the uml build errors? >>>> >>>> I didn't realize that this is a super urgent issue. ;-) >>>> >>>> Kees, if you want you can carry a patch in your series, I'll ack it. >>>> Otherwise I can also do a patch and bring it via the uml tree upstream >>>> as soon more fixes queued up. >>> >>> I think the lkdtm change will tweak this bug, so I'm happy to carry the >>> patch (I just haven't had time to create and test one). Is it really >>> just as simple as removing arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h? >>> >> >> I just tried that and the build is still failing, so No, it's not that simple. >> >> But thanks for offering. >> >> I'll just ignore the UML build errors for now. > > This is a allyesconfig? > I just gave CONFIG_LKDTM=y a try, builds fine here. > I'm building linux-next and it fails. > But the desc.h in uml is still in vain and can be deleted AFAICT. -- ~Randy
