On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:29 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 6/24/20 1:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:23:25AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > >>>>> Regardless, it seems arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h is not needed any more? > >>> > >>>> True that, we can rip the file. > >>> > >>> Has anyone fixed the uml build errors? > >> > >> I didn't realize that this is a super urgent issue. ;-) > >> > >> Kees, if you want you can carry a patch in your series, I'll ack it. > >> Otherwise I can also do a patch and bring it via the uml tree upstream > >> as soon more fixes queued up. > > > > I think the lkdtm change will tweak this bug, so I'm happy to carry the > > patch (I just haven't had time to create and test one). Is it really > > just as simple as removing arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h? > > > > I just tried that and the build is still failing, so No, it's not that simple. > > But thanks for offering. > > I'll just ignore the UML build errors for now. This is a allyesconfig? I just gave CONFIG_LKDTM=y a try, builds fine here. But the desc.h in uml is still in vain and can be deleted AFAICT. -- Thanks, //richard
