On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:06:12PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 02:14:08PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:46:14AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 07:12:22PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > As pointed out by Boris, the defines for bits in IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL > > > > are quite a mouthful, especially the VMX bits which must differentiate > > > > between enabling VMX inside and outside SMX (TXT) operation. Rename the > > > > bit defines to abbreviate FEATURE_CONTROL as FEAT_CTL so that they're a > > > > little friendlier on the eyes. Keep the full name for the MSR itself to > > > > help even the most obtuse reader decipher the abbreviation, and to match > > > > the name used by the Intel SDM. > > > > > > If you anyway shorten the prefix, why not then go directly to FT_CTL? > > > It is as obvious as FEAT_CTL is. Given the exhausting long variable > > > names like FEAT_CTL_VMX_ENABLED_OUTSIDE_SMX this would be worth of > > > considering. > > > > If we're going to rename the function and file, I think we should stick > > with the slightly longer FEAT_CTL. FT_CTL for the bits is ok since there > > is more context to work with, but init_ft_ctl_msr() looks weird to me. > > OK. I mean Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> /Jarkko
