On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:04:13PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > On 02/08/2019 18:03, Cristian Marussi wrote: > > Added a simple fake_sigreturn testcase which places a valid > > sigframe on a non-16 bytes aligned SP. > > fake_sigretrun() helper function has been patched accordingly > > to support placing a sigframe on a non-16 bytes aligned address. > > Expects a SIGSEGV on test PASS. > > > > Adds also a test TODO lists holding some further test ideas. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Re-added this text after fixing the forced misaglinment procedure in > > fake_sigreturn() itself: require a ZERO alignment and you'll get > > your sigframe placed on a misaligned SP (2-bytes off the 16-align) > > --- > > .../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/signals.S | 21 +++++++++---- > > .../arm64/signal/testcases/TODO.readme | 8 +++++ > > .../testcases/fake_sigreturn_misaligned_sp.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/TODO.readme > > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_misaligned_sp.c > > > > When this test was re-added in V3, the related .gitignore was missed. > It will go in V4 Ack, or otherwise try switching to using wildcards in .gitignore as suggested in my reply to patch 4. [...] Cheers ---Dave
