On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:41:59AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:27 AM Tycho Andersen <tycho@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 08:12:50AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:26 PM shuah <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I am running Linux 5.0-rc2 and not an older kernel. > > > > > > Weird. I couldn't reproduce this on 5.0-rc2, but I did see it on a > > > kernel without seccomp user_notif. Does the patch I sent fix it for > > > you? (And if so, can you take it in your tree?) > > > > I can reproduce it; you have to run it as non-root. I think your patch > > is necessary to get it to at least fail. The question is: what should > > we do about these tests that require real root? Skip them if we're not > > real-root, I guess? > > Hm, maybe use the XFAIL() bit of the harness? > > Perhaps it's time to make it a root-only test and do internal > priv-dropping to test the nnp-requiring parts? I'll add it to the TODO > list... Ok, I'll try to send a couple of patches soon to fix some of this up. But at least yours should should stop things from hanging for now. Thanks, Tycho
