Linux 5.0-rc2 seccomp_bpf user_notification_basic test hangs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kees and James,

seccomp_bpf test hangs right after the following test passes
with EBUSY. Please see log at the end.

/* Installing a second listener in the chain should EBUSY */
        EXPECT_EQ(user_trap_syscall(__NR_getpid,
                                    SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER),
                  -1);
        EXPECT_EQ(errno, EBUSY);


The user_notification_basic test starts running I assume and then
the hang.

The only commit I see that could be suspect is the following as
it talks about adding SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF

commit d9a7fa67b4bfe6ce93ee9aab23ae2e7ca0763e84
Merge: f218a29c25ad 55b8cbe470d1
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Wed Jan 2 09:48:13 2019 -0800

Merge branch 'next-seccomp' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security

    Pull seccomp updates from James Morris:

     - Add SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF

     - seccomp fixes for sparse warnings and s390 build (Tycho)

* 'next-seccomp' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security:
      seccomp, s390: fix build for syscall type change
      seccomp: fix poor type promotion
      samples: add an example of seccomp user trap
      seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace
      seccomp: switch system call argument type to void *
      seccomp: hoist struct seccomp_data recalculation higher


Any ideas on how to proceed? Here is the log. The following
reproduces the problem.

make -C tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/ run_tests


seccomp_bpf.c:2947:global.get_metadata:Expected 0 (0) == seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG, &prog) (18446744073709551615) seccomp_bpf.c:2959:global.get_metadata:Expected 1 (1) == read(pipefd[0], &buf, 1) (0)
global.get_metadata: Test terminated by assertion
[     FAIL ] global.get_metadata
[ RUN      ] global.user_notification_basic
seccomp_bpf.c:3036:global.user_notification_basic:Expected 0 (0) == WEXITSTATUS(status) (1) seccomp_bpf.c:3039:global.user_notification_basic:Expected seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog) (18446744073709551615) == 0 (0) seccomp_bpf.c:3040:global.user_notification_basic:Expected seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog) (18446744073709551615) == 0 (0) seccomp_bpf.c:3041:global.user_notification_basic:Expected seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog) (18446744073709551615) == 0 (0) seccomp_bpf.c:3042:global.user_notification_basic:Expected seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog) (18446744073709551615) == 0 (0) seccomp_bpf.c:3047:global.user_notification_basic:Expected listener (18446744073709551615) >= 0 (0) seccomp_bpf.c:3053:global.user_notification_basic:Expected errno (13) == EBUSY (16)

thanks,
-- Shuah



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux