On 05/11/2018 02:02 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:33:26PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >> Yeah. I see that. You have a switch for the KSFT_ values. Since there is no >> dependency on the cgroup tree, I would recommend having this patch go through >> kselftest tree which is the normal process for tests anyway. >> >> This version is good and I can apply this to linux-kselftest next. I ran a >> quick test and the Skip case looks good. >> >> TAP version 13 >> selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol >> ======================================== >> 1..0 # Skipped: memory controller isn't available >> not ok 1..1 selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol [SKIP] >> >> >> Tejun! Please send me your Ack. > > Sure, please feel free to add my ack. I'll revert the original patch > from cgroup tree. > > Thanks. > Thanks. I will apply this to linux-kselftest next for 4.18-rc1 with you Ack. thanks, -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
