Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/cgroup: memory controller self-tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:33:26PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Yeah. I see that. You have a switch for the KSFT_ values. Since there is no
> dependency on the cgroup tree, I would recommend having this patch go through
> kselftest tree which is the normal process for tests anyway.
> 
> This version is good and I can apply this to linux-kselftest next. I ran a
> quick test and the Skip case looks good.
> 
> TAP version 13
> selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol
> ========================================
> 1..0 # Skipped: memory controller isn't available
> not ok 1..1 selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol [SKIP]
> 
> 
> Tejun! Please send me your Ack.

Sure, please feel free to add my ack.  I'll revert the original patch
from cgroup tree.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux