> On Nov 19, 2017, at 5:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:50:23PM -0600, Tom Gall wrote: >> At Linaro we’ve been putting effort into regularly running kernel tests over >> arm, arm64 and x86_64 targets. On those targets we’re running mainline, -next, >> 4.4, and 4.9 kernels and yes we are adding to this list as the hardware >> capacity grows. >> >> For test buckets we’re using just LTP, kselftest and libhugetlbfs and >> like kernels we will add to this list. > > I'm sorry, I don't understand this sentance. I was just saying that we intend to add more test buckets and more kernels. For instance 4.13-rc just was added to the mix. For test buckets, I’m currently dorking around with some make check targets for a few interesting packages. > >> With the 4.14 cycle being a little ‘different’ in so much as the goal to >> have it be an LTS kernel I think it’s important to take a look at some >> 4.14 test results. >> >> Grab a beverage, this is a bit of a long post. But quick summery 4.14 as >> released looks just as good as 4.13, for the test buckets I named above. > > Thanks for doing this testing and letting us know. > > greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
