Re: Towards 4.14 LTS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:50:23PM -0600, Tom Gall wrote:
> At Linaro we’ve been putting effort into regularly running kernel tests over 
> arm, arm64 and x86_64 targets. On those targets we’re running mainline, -next, 
> 4.4, and 4.9 kernels and yes we are adding to this list as the hardware 
> capacity grows.
> 
> For test buckets we’re using just LTP, kselftest and libhugetlbfs and
> like kernels we will add to this list. 

I'm sorry, I don't understand this sentance.

> With the 4.14 cycle being a little ‘different’ in so much as the goal to 
> have it be an LTS kernel I think it’s important to take a look at some 
> 4.14 test results. 
> 
> Grab a beverage, this is a bit of a long post. But quick summery 4.14 as 
> released looks just as good as 4.13, for the test buckets I named above.

Thanks for doing this testing and letting us know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux