On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:58:20 -0600 Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/08/2017 06:01 AM, Thomas Meyer wrote: > > The multiple_kprobes test case fails to check for KPROBE_EVENT support. > > Add the check to prevent a false test result. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc > > index 2a1cb9908746..a4fd4c851a5b 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc > > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ > > #!/bin/sh > > # description: Register/unregister many kprobe events > > > > +[ -f kprobe_events ] || exit_unsupported # this is configurable > > + > > # ftrace fentry skip size depends on the machine architecture. > > # Currently HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE defined on x86 and powerpc64le > > case `uname -m` in > > > > Hi Steve/Masami, > > This patch looks good to me. Adds a check similar to the one one in > tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/functions Yes, this looks good to me too :) Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! > > If you don't have objections, I will get this into 4.14-rc2 or rc3 > > thanks, > -- Shuah > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
